<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lemonad &#187; Animals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonasnockert.com/tag/animals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonasnockert.com</link>
	<description>Jonas Nockert's weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:54:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Creatures great and small</title>
		<link>http://jonasnockert.com/2003/10/creatures_great_and_small/</link>
		<comments>http://jonasnockert.com/2003/10/creatures_great_and_small/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Nockert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/2003/10/23/creatures_great_and_small/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since I got the new O&#8217;Reilly catalogue in my mailbox, I&#8217;ve been thinking about their covers and the animals depicted upon them. Basically, for those who doesn&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m talking about, is that this book company uses a different animal for each of their books but similar animals across series.
My immediate thought was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since I got the new <a href="http://www.oreilly.com/25anniversary/">O&#8217;Reilly</a> catalogue in my mailbox, I&#8217;ve been thinking about their covers and the animals depicted upon them. Basically, for those who doesn&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m talking about, is that this book company uses a different animal for each of their books but similar animals across series.</p>
<p>My immediate thought was that there has to be a lot of downright lame animals that would make an entire series totally uninteresting and unfit for sales. My second thought was to make a list of said animals. The latter would later prove to, more or less, put a hold to updates of this blog. I really have had a hard time coming up with animals that I feel unequivocally suck and which I would not feel at all bad about including in that category. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, there really are an abundance of <i>boring</i> animals (i.e. the cod, the slug and the stick insect). There&#8217;s definitely also a lot of <i>cute</i> animals which at varying degrees would make oneself steer cleer of books featuring them on their cover (i.e. the cat, the dog, and the dolphin). Then there&#8217;s the category of animals which bring about <i>dislike</i> (i.e. flies, scorpions and cockroaches). Snakes and sharks could very well fall into this category as well.</p>
<p>Anyhow, my top choices so far for lame O&#8217;Reilly series animals are as follows:</p>
<dl>
<dd>(1) The hermit crab (Programming .NET Components)</dd>
<dd>(2) The stupid dog trick (VBScript Pocket Reference)</dd>
<dd>(3) The cow (Practical C)</dd>
<dd>(4) The boring cat (as opposed to most cats, who are fun. UML in a Nutshell)</dd>
<dd>(5) The opossum (ActionScript Cookbook)</dd>
<dd>(6) The biting shark (Web Security)</dd>
<dd>(7) The ass (Hardening Cisco Routers)</dd>
</dl>
<p>Stay cool, steer clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonasnockert.com/2003/10/creatures_great_and_small/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
